🔗 Share this article

In my role as a DM, I traditionally steered clear of significant use of luck during my D&D adventures. My preference was for the plot and what happened in a game to be determined by deliberate decisions instead of random chance. However, I decided to change my approach, and I'm very happy with the result.

The Spark: Seeing 'Luck Rolls'

A well-known actual-play show utilizes a DM who frequently asks for "chance rolls" from the participants. The process entails picking a type of die and defining possible results based on the result. It's essentially no distinct from using a pre-generated chart, these are devised in the moment when a player's action lacks a obvious conclusion.

I decided to try this method at my own table, primarily because it looked novel and provided a break from my usual habits. The outcome were fantastic, prompting me to reconsider the often-debated dynamic between pre-determination and randomization in a roleplaying game.

A Memorable In-Game Example

In a recent session, my group had concluded a city-wide battle. When the dust settled, a cleric character inquired after two key NPCs—a brother and sister—had made it. In place of deciding myself, I asked for a roll. I instructed the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. The stakes were: on a 1-4, both would perish; a middling roll, only one would die; a high roll, they both lived.

The player rolled a 4. This led to a deeply emotional moment where the party came upon the corpses of their allies, forever holding hands in their final moments. The party performed funeral rites, which was particularly meaningful due to previous story developments. As a parting reward, I decided that the NPCs' bodies were suddenly transformed, showing a magical Prayer Bead. By chance, the bead's contained spell was perfectly what the party required to solve another critical story problem. It's impossible to plan this type of magical moments.

Honing On-the-Spot Skills

This incident made me wonder if improvisation and making it up are truly the core of D&D. Even if you are a prep-heavy DM, your improvisation muscles may atrophy. Players frequently find joy in ignoring the most carefully laid plans. Therefore, a good DM must be able to adapt swiftly and fabricate details in real-time.

Utilizing similar mechanics is a fantastic way to train these abilities without straying too much outside your usual style. The strategy is to deploy them for low-stakes circumstances that won't drastically alter the session's primary direction. As an example, I would avoid using it to determine if the king's advisor is a traitor. Instead, I would consider using it to decide if the party enter a room just in time to see a major incident unfolds.

Strengthening Collaborative Storytelling

Luck rolls also helps keep players engaged and create the sensation that the adventure is responsive, shaping in reaction to their actions in real-time. It reduces the feeling that they are merely characters in a pre-written story, thereby strengthening the collaborative nature of roleplaying.

This approach has always been integral to the original design. The game's roots were enamored with encounter generators, which suited a playstyle focused on exploration. While contemporary D&D frequently prioritizes narrative and role-play, leading many DMs to feel they require detailed plans, that may not be the best approach.

Achieving the Sweet Spot

Absolutely nothing wrong with doing your prep. But, equally valid no problem with letting go and permitting the whim of chance to determine certain outcomes instead of you. Control is a significant factor in a DM's job. We need it to run the game, yet we can be reluctant to cede it, even when doing so could be beneficial.

My final suggestion is this: Don't be afraid of relinquishing a bit of the reins. Experiment with a little chance for smaller story elements. The result could create that the surprising result is significantly more memorable than anything you might have planned by yourself.