🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking connections viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters praising your advice on expanding your business? Do recruiters reaching out to explore collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the explanation could be your gender.

The Experiment: Changing Profile Gender to achieve Better Visibility

Numerous women participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment this week following viral posts indicated that changing their profile gender to "man" boosted their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to include what they called "bro-coded" terminology - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "drive", "transform" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors men who employ professional networking terminology.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which posts are shown to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a blog post, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" affect how content are received.

Changing gender in your settings does not affect how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "a masculine version", reported extraordinary results.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after observing her reach decrease significantly.

The Method

• First, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Finally, she recycled old posts with similar "agentic" style

The outcome was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the success, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the method.

"Previously, my content were softer - brief and clever, but also warm and human," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - like a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after seven days, saying "Each day I continued, and outcomes improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Not all testers encountered positive results. One writer who changed both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Broader Implications

These tests occur alongside ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a professional network and community site.

Platform modifications in recent months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to informal experiments where identical posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

System Details

Per LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread posts based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "examinations of inequalities based on gender."

Company representative proposed that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to more content on the network.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she commented. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."