🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the New York mayoral election, Michael Lange issued a bold forecast – going beyond who would win citywide, and precinct by precinct. The analyst, an expert in elections born and raised in the city, devoted more than ten years in left-leaning activism and emerged as a kind of well-known figure recently for his deep dives into municipal statistics and polling.

He released his highly detailed forecast map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win while failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange possesses a talent for witty coinages. He pointed out, for instance, the divide between the progressive stronghold, stretching from Park Slope to Bushwick to a third locale, where he predicted (accurately) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. There, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal surpass the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward the independent, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Trends and Unexpected Results

How was your election night?

I had to do that because they were dropping approximately 200K ballots into the tally every few minutes! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: The candidate led the initial ballots by 12 points, but there were two big batches of votes added later and the advantage dropped from 12% to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world where yesterday turned out kind of poorly for him, where Cuomo was going to end up basically increasing his support from the earlier contest. However the winner added half a million supporters to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He went out and massively expanded his support from the first round.

Expanding Support

How did the mayor-elect gain those extra votes from?

He built the coalition that the left always wanted to build: diverse racially, it’s young, tenants and individuals facing cost pressures. He gained significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the primary. Plus he further maximized his core of liberal progressives, young leftists, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without making those significant inroads.

He created the coalition that the left long aimed for: multiracial, young, renters and residents squeezed by affordability

There were also a number of Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It is a real thing, limited to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Muslims. Electors in ethnic enclaves that went for Trump previously backed the progressive now. But I wouldn’t say he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Impact

One of the big stories of the election was the record participation. Who did that help?

Both sides. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I figured we might go over two million, but it reached 2.3 million – which is a huge number of participants. Existed a decent anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Currently you would say he’s favored to surpass 50%. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still around 200,000 votes left to report at that time. Thus I don’t think certain, but I believe probable, and I hope he does because then no one can say the Republican was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His vote completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any borough. Not even Tottenville in the borough, similar to an highly conservative neighborhood. That truly was unexpected. Cuomo kept very white areas, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many Republicans on the island who had a high participation. I believe there was a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened before the former president tweeted his support for the candidate, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide unless Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

Regarding your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for Mamdani overwhelming in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think there was a little dilution of the commie corridor in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, instance, the Greek landlords and residents all went for the independent. So there was some opposition. However no, mostly the commie corridor is another huge reason why Mamdani won – he was polling between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote we reported on whether Mamdani was gaining ground with the community. Is there any suggestion that he did?

There are areas with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as specific locales – where he performed strongly. However in the affluent districts like the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential in those places. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. Plus, you have Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, they were strongly Cuomo. Therefore it’s unclear if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the Upper West Side with large leads.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest political leaders from the left come from a handful of neighborhoods in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that there will be additional examples – candidates will emerge from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I think that each urban center in America could develop their own commie corridor. Cities are the centers of leftwing power in America – because youth reside there, tenancy is common and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the disparities exist.